WHAT??? I am really much more ccrnenoed that the issue of what’s best for a child in a custody proceeding is being diverted into a private justice system. What issues other than the best interests of (unrepresented) children could possibly be more resonant of the public interest and needful of public proceedings? My own socio-economic and ancestrally privileged position in society acknowledged, how much justice can we expect from a largely upper-middle class white male private adjudicative system, particularly for non-mainstream parents, i.e., the GLBT community? Shouldn’t there be a little outrage here or have I not thought the thing through? Maybe the journalistic confusion resulted from the reporter’s inability to process the gravity of the decision reported upon.
Loading...
Comments are closed.
AI Assistant
Discover more from Valenti Law
Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.
WHAT??? I am really much more ccrnenoed that the issue of what’s best for a child in a custody proceeding is being diverted into a private justice system. What issues other than the best interests of (unrepresented) children could possibly be more resonant of the public interest and needful of public proceedings? My own socio-economic and ancestrally privileged position in society acknowledged, how much justice can we expect from a largely upper-middle class white male private adjudicative system, particularly for non-mainstream parents, i.e., the GLBT community? Shouldn’t there be a little outrage here or have I not thought the thing through? Maybe the journalistic confusion resulted from the reporter’s inability to process the gravity of the decision reported upon.